It may sound like something out of the world of X Men and Professor Xavier, but brain-control might be a reality in the next few years.
Extraordinary advances in computer technology that can link with the human brain have been made in the past years. It is understood that some military applications are looking at so called “thinking caps” which can be used by trained soldiers to give them mental control over weaponry. This raises the prospects of war zones being controlled from thousands of miles away.
The extensive use of drones used by the American military is helping to focus minds on the idea that this prospect may be about to move out of the realms of science fiction.
Not all potential applications focus on war, however. Neurostimulation techniques such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and neural brain cell stimulation are undergoing medical trials.
It raise the prospects of someone being able to control a wheelchair with the power of their mind or give someone with locked in syndrome the power to communicate. It is also opening up possibility of new treatments for depression, strokes or speech problems. Some of the techniques under investigation are non-invasive but others are looking at the possibility of implanting computer chips into the brain.
The developments have prompted a fresh debate on the ethical dilemmas being faced by scientists, in particular, the prospect of soldiers controlling super weapons with their minds and paralysed people and dementia sufferers being able to regain control of their minds and bodies. The Nuffield Council on Bioethics, which is based in the UK, has launched a world wide consultation on an industry that is said to be worth at least $8 billion and probably far more once medical treatments are included.
The ethical debate is being led by Prof Thomas Baldwin from York University. He says that developments are causing an equal mixture of hope and fear. He said the big challenge of enhancing the brain was to think about the fundamentals of what makes people human beings and why do we behave in the way we do. (Jane Harris 2012)